You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of an audit and feedback intervention to reduce gentamicin prescription errors in newborn treatment (ReGENT) in neonatal inpatient care in Kenya: a controlled interrupted time series study protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13012-022-01203-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Timothy Tuti, Jalemba Aluvaala, Lucas Malla, Grace Irimu, George Mbevi, John Wainaina, Livingstone Mumelo, Kefa Wairoto, Dolphine Mochache, Christiane Hagel, Michuki Maina, Mike English |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Kenya | 4 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
South Africa | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
Scientists | 4 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 12% |
Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 22 | 65% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 22 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,260,255
of 25,118,194 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#677
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,984
of 436,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,118,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.