You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A blind area of family planning services in China: unintended pregnancy among unmarried graduate students
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-198 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuanzhong Zhou, Chengliang Xiong, Jinwen Xiong, Xuejun Shang, Guohui Liu, Meimei Zhang, Pin Yin |
| Abstract |
Status of premarital sex, unintended pregnancy and associated factors among Chinese graduate students remain unclear. And unmarried graduate students' needs of family planning services seem to be ignored. In the present study, we ascertained the prevalence rate of premarital sex and unintended pregnancy, as well as estimated the possible factors associated with unintended pregnancy among unmarried Chinese graduate students, and evaluated their reproductive health needs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,164,012
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,271
of 14,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,628
of 194,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#202
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.