↓ Skip to main content

Factors influencing health care utilisation among Aboriginal cardiac patients in central Australia: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors influencing health care utilisation among Aboriginal cardiac patients in central Australia: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-83
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stella Artuso, Margaret Cargo, Alex Brown, Mark Daniel

Abstract

Aboriginal Australians suffer from poorer overall health compared to the general Australian population, particularly in terms of cardiovascular disease and prognosis following a cardiac event. Despite such disparities, Aboriginal Australians utilise health care services at much lower rates than the general population. Improving health care utilisation (HCU) among Aboriginal cardiac patients requires a better understanding of the factors that constrain or facilitate use. The study aimed to identify ecological factors influencing health care utilisation (HCU) for Aboriginal cardiac patients, from the time of their cardiac event to 6-12 months post-event, in central Australia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 <1%
Unknown 132 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 21%
Student > Master 22 16%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 10 7%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 16%
Social Sciences 18 13%
Psychology 8 6%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 29 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,611,588
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#548
of 7,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,561
of 194,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#8
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.