↓ Skip to main content

Correction: Vitamin D activates FBP1 to block the Warburg effect and modulate blast metabolism in acute myeloid leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Biomarker Research, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction: Vitamin D activates FBP1 to block the Warburg effect and modulate blast metabolism in acute myeloid leukemia
Published in
Biomarker Research, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40364-022-00379-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Xu, Christopher Hino, David J. Baylink, Jeffrey Xiao, Mark E. Reeves, Jiang F. Zhong, Saied Mirshahidi, Huynh Cao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#15,687,628
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Biomarker Research
#168
of 332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,444
of 442,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomarker Research
#12
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 332 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.