↓ Skip to main content

RNA quantification using gold nanoprobes - application to cancer diagnostics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanobiotechnology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RNA quantification using gold nanoprobes - application to cancer diagnostics
Published in
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/1477-3155-8-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

João Conde, Jesús M de la Fuente, Pedro V Baptista

Abstract

Molecular nanodiagnostics applied to cancer may provide rapid and sensitive detection of cancer related molecular alterations, which would enable early detection even when those alterations occur only in a small percentage of cells. The use of gold nanoparticles derivatized with thiol modified oligonucleotides (Au-nanoprobes) for the detection of specific nucleic acid targets has been gaining momentum as an alternative to more traditional methodologies. Here, we present an Au-nanoparticles based approach for the molecular recognition and quantification of the BCR-ABL fusion transcript (mRNA), which is responsible for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and to the best of our knowledge it is the first time quantification of a specific mRNA directly in cancer cells is reported. This inexpensive and very easy to perform Au-nanoprobe based method allows quantification of unamplified total human RNA and specific detection of the oncogene transcript. The sensitivity settled by the Au-nanoprobes allows differential gene expression from 10 ng/mul of total RNA and takes less than 30 min to complete after total RNA extraction, minimizing RNA degradation. Also, at later stages, accumulation of malignant mutations may lead to resistance to chemotherapy and consequently poor outcome. Such a method, allowing for fast and direct detection and quantification of the chimeric BCR-ABL mRNA, could speed up diagnostics and, if appropriate, revision of therapy. This assay may constitute a promising tool in early diagnosis of CML and could easily be extended to further target genes with proven involvement in cancer development.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 2%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 101 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 26%
Student > Master 19 18%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 15%
Chemistry 13 12%
Engineering 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 12 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,265,264
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#645
of 1,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,630
of 93,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,395 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them