You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conceptualizing performance of nursing care as a prerequisite for better measurement: a systematic and interpretive review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nursing, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6955-12-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carl-Ardy Dubois, Danielle D’Amour, Marie-Pascale Pomey, Francine Girard, Isabelle Brault |
| Abstract |
Despite the critical role of nursing care in determining high-performing healthcare delivery, performance science in this area is still at an early stage of development and nursing's contribution most often remains invisible to policy-makers and managers. The objectives of this study were: 1) to develop a theoretically based framework to conceptualize nursing care performance; 2) to analyze how the different components of the framework have been operationalized in the literature; and 3) to develop a pool of indicators sensitive to various aspects of nursing care that can be used as a basis for designing a performance measurement system. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 54% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 262 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 63 | 23% |
| Researcher | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 60 | 22% |
| Unknown | 62 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 103 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 63 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,318,735
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#96
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,904
of 196,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.