↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for the management of Pain and Sedation in Newborns undergoing Therapeutic hypothermia for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (IPSNUT): protocol of a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for the management of Pain and Sedation in Newborns undergoing Therapeutic hypothermia for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (IPSNUT): protocol of a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13643-022-01982-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pyrola Bäcke, Matteo Bruschettini, Ylva Thernström Blomqvist, Emma Olsson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 20 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 22 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#15,687,628
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,615
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,437
of 441,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#37
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.