↓ Skip to main content

Impact of RNA degradation on fusion detection by RNA-seq

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of RNA degradation on fusion detection by RNA-seq
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-3161-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaime I. Davila, Numrah M. Fadra, Xiaoke Wang, Amber M. McDonald, Asha A. Nair, Barbara, R. Crusan, Xianglin Wu, Joseph H. Blommel, Jin Jen, Kandelaria M. Rumilla, Robert B. Jenkins, Umut Aypar, Eric W. Klee, Benjamin R. Kipp, Kevin C. Halling

Abstract

RNA-seq is a well-established method for studying the transcriptome. Popular methods for library preparation in RNA-seq such as Illumina TruSeq® RNA v2 kit use a poly-A pulldown strategy. Such methods can cause loss of coverage at the 5' end of genes, impacting the ability to detect fusions when used on degraded samples. The goal of this study was to quantify the effects RNA degradation has on fusion detection when using poly-A selected mRNA and to identify the variables involved in this process. Using both artificially and naturally degraded samples, we found that there is a reduced ability to detect fusions as the distance of the breakpoint from the 3' end of the gene increases. The median transcript coverage decreases exponentially as a function of the distance from the 3' end and there is a linear relationship between the coverage decay rate and the RNA integrity number (RIN). Based on these findings we developed plots that show the probability of detecting a gene fusion ("sensitivity") as a function of the distance of the fusion breakpoint from the 3' end. This study developed a strategy to assess the impact that RNA degradation has on the ability to detect gene fusions by RNA-seq.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
South Africa 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Unknown 51 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Master 8 14%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,059,611
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,112
of 10,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,944
of 317,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#26
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.