↓ Skip to main content

Bilateral papilledema in a child with osteogenesis imperfecta

Overview of attention for article published in Eye and Vision, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bilateral papilledema in a child with osteogenesis imperfecta
Published in
Eye and Vision, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40662-016-0056-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Selam Yekta Sendul, Cemile Ucgul Atilgan, Semra Tiryaki, Dilek Guven

Abstract

To present a female child patient with osteogenesis imperfecta who had bilateral papilledema. A twelve-year-old girl with osteogenesis imperfecta was referred to our clinic. Bilateral best corrected visual acuity of the patient was 5/10 (corrected with +3.50 for right eye, +5.00 for left eye) with a standard Snellen scale at a distance of a 6 m. Anterior chamber, iris and lens examination of both of her eyes were unremarkable. In her fundus examination, bilateral stage 2 papilledema and the wrinkles in papillomacular area were noticed. Optical coherence tomography images revealed the macular pucker and thickening in the retinal nerve fibre layers of both eyes. Computed tomography images revealed that there were ossifications in the optic chiasma and occlusion in all periorbital sinus areas. Osteogenesis imperfecta is a rare, autosomal dominant connective tissue disorder characterised by bone fractures, deafness and blue sclera. We would like to draw attention to the clinical course of our patient with computed tomography, optical coherence tomography and visual field findings.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 18%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2017.
All research outputs
#12,562,904
of 21,446,675 outputs
Outputs from Eye and Vision
#51
of 214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,407
of 316,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eye and Vision
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,446,675 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.