You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bilateral papilledema in a child with osteogenesis imperfecta
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Eye and Vision, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40662-016-0056-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Selam Yekta Sendul, Cemile Ucgul Atilgan, Semra Tiryaki, Dilek Guven |
| Abstract |
To present a female child patient with osteogenesis imperfecta who had bilateral papilledema. A twelve-year-old girl with osteogenesis imperfecta was referred to our clinic. Bilateral best corrected visual acuity of the patient was 5/10 (corrected with +3.50 for right eye, +5.00 for left eye) with a standard Snellen scale at a distance of a 6 m. Anterior chamber, iris and lens examination of both of her eyes were unremarkable. In her fundus examination, bilateral stage 2 papilledema and the wrinkles in papillomacular area were noticed. Optical coherence tomography images revealed the macular pucker and thickening in the retinal nerve fibre layers of both eyes. Computed tomography images revealed that there were ossifications in the optic chiasma and occlusion in all periorbital sinus areas. Osteogenesis imperfecta is a rare, autosomal dominant connective tissue disorder characterised by bone fractures, deafness and blue sclera. We would like to draw attention to the clinical course of our patient with computed tomography, optical coherence tomography and visual field findings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2017.
All research outputs
#13,407,768
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Eye and Vision
#52
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,620
of 315,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eye and Vision
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.