↓ Skip to main content

Climate change and mosquito-borne diseases in China: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Climate change and mosquito-borne diseases in China: a review
Published in
Globalization and Health, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-9-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Bai, Lindsay Carol Morton, Qiyong Liu

Abstract

China has experienced noticeable changes in climate over the past 100 years and the potential impact climate change has on transmission of mosquito-borne infectious diseases poses a risk to Chinese populations. The aims of this paper are to summarize what is known about the impact of climate change on the incidence and prevalence of malaria, dengue fever and Japanese encephalitis in China and to provide important information and direction for adaptation policy making. Fifty-five papers met the inclusion criteria for this study. Examination of these studies indicates that variability in temperature, precipitation, wind, and extreme weather events is linked to transmission of mosquito-borne diseases in some regions of China. However, study findings are inconsistent across geographical locations and this requires strengthening current evidence for timely development of adaptive options. After synthesis of available information we make several key adaptation recommendations including: improving current surveillance and monitoring systems; concentrating adaptation strategies and policies on vulnerable communities; strengthening adaptive capacity of public health systems; developing multidisciplinary approaches sustained by an new mechanism of inter-sectional coordination; and increasing awareness and mobilization of the general public.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 296 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 19%
Researcher 48 16%
Student > Bachelor 38 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 59 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 17%
Environmental Science 39 13%
Social Sciences 20 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 5%
Other 56 18%
Unknown 66 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,611,851
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#251
of 1,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,160
of 201,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.