You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neuromuscular blocking agents in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc12557 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Waleed Alhazzani, Mohamed Alshahrani, Roman Jaeschke, Jean Marie Forel, Laurent Papazian, Jonathan Sevransky, Maureen O Meade |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 8 | 24% |
| United States | 4 | 12% |
| Australia | 4 | 12% |
| South Africa | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 222 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 38 | 17% |
| Other | 27 | 12% |
| Researcher | 27 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 64 | 28% |
| Unknown | 31 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 160 | 70% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 40 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,239,557
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,030
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,089
of 212,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#11
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.