↓ Skip to main content

Transforming primary healthcare by including the stakeholders involved in delivering care to people living in poverty: EQUIhealThY study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transforming primary healthcare by including the stakeholders involved in delivering care to people living in poverty: EQUIhealThY study protocol
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-92
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Loignon, Catherine Hudon, Alexandrine Boudreault-Fournier, Sophie Dupéré, Ann C Macaulay, Pierre Pluye, Isabelle Gaboury, Jeannie L Haggerty, Martin Fortin, Émilie Goulet, Mireille Lambert, Luce Pelissier-Simard, Sophie Boyer, Marianne de Laat, Francine Lemire, Louise Champagne, Martin Lemieux

Abstract

Ensuring access to timely and appropriate primary healthcare for people living in poverty is an issue facing all countries, even those with universal healthcare systems. The transformation of healthcare practices and organization could be improved by involving key stakeholders from the community and the healthcare system in the development of research interventions. The aim of this project is to stimulate changes in healthcare organizations and practices by encouraging collaboration between care teams and people living in poverty. Our objectives are twofold: 1) to identify actions required to promote the adoption of professional practices oriented toward social competence in primary care teams; and 2) to examine factors that would encourage the inclusion of people living in poverty in the process of developing social competence in healthcare organizations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
India 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 95 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Librarian 6 6%
Other 25 25%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 15%
Social Sciences 15 15%
Psychology 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 29 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,065,249
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,369
of 7,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,613
of 197,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#21
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.