↓ Skip to main content

Low urine pH and acid excretion do not predict bone fractures or the loss of bone mineral density: a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low urine pH and acid excretion do not predict bone fractures or the loss of bone mineral density: a prospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-11-88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanis R Fenton, Misha Eliasziw, Suzanne C Tough, Andrew W Lyon, Jacques P Brown, David A Hanley

Abstract

The acid-ash hypothesis, the alkaline diet, and related products are marketed to the general public. Websites, lay literature, and direct mail marketing encourage people to measure their urine pH to assess their health status and their risk of osteoporosis.The objectives of this study were to determine whether 1) low urine pH, or 2) acid excretion in urine [sulfate + chloride + 1.8x phosphate + organic acids] minus [sodium + potassium + 2x calcium + 2x magnesium mEq] in fasting morning urine predict: a) fragility fractures; and b) five-year change of bone mineral density (BMD) in adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 22 26%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,315,152
of 23,393,453 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#246
of 4,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,250
of 96,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,453 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.