↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Diagnostic and prognostic value of plasma microRNA-195 in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Diagnostic and prognostic value of plasma microRNA-195 in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12957-016-0980-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keli Su, Tingcui Zhang, Yongrui Wang, Guijun Hao

Abstract

Recently, circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have been reported to be stably detectable in plasma/serum and to function as potent biomarkers in various cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression level of plasma miRNA-195 in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and investigate its diagnostic and prognostic value. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed to evaluate plasma miRNA-195 levels in 100 NSCLC patients and 100 healthy volunteers. The association between miRNA-195 expression and clinicopathological factors as well as the overall survival was analyzed. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was carried out to assess the potential value of plasma miRNA-195 for NSCLC diagnosis. Plasma miRNA-195 was downregulated in NSCLC patients compared with healthy controls (P < 0.001). Decreased plasma miRNA-195 expression was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis and advanced clinical stage. ROC curve analysis showed that plasma miRNA-195 was a useful marker for NSCLC diagnosis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed low plasma miRNA-195 expression as an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for NSCLC patients. These findings indicate that plasma miRNA-195 might serve as a promising biomarker for the early detection and prognosis evaluation of NSCLC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 22%
Researcher 4 15%
Lecturer 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Linguistics 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#17,823,285
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#871
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,061
of 341,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.