↓ Skip to main content

Responsiveness of the MOS-HIV and EQ-5D in HIV-infected adults receiving antiretroviral therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Responsiveness of the MOS-HIV and EQ-5D in HIV-infected adults receiving antiretroviral therapies
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-11-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Albert W Wu, Kristin A Hanson, Gale Harding, Seema Haider, Margaret Tawadrous, Alexandra Khachatryan, Chris L Pashos, Kit N Simpson

Abstract

Selection of an appropriate patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for a clinical trial requires knowledge of the instrument's responsiveness to detecting treatment effects. The purpose of this study was to examine the responsiveness of two health-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments used in clinical trials involving HIV-infected adults: the HIV-targeted Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV), and a generic measure, the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Other 5 6%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Psychology 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 25 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,164,797
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,125
of 2,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,929
of 195,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.