You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Synonymous codon usage bias is correlative to intron number and shows disequilibrium among exons in plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-56 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhen Qin, Zhengqiu Cai, Guangmin Xia, Mengcheng Wang |
| Abstract |
Evidence has been assembled to suggest synonymous codon usage bias (SCUB) has close relationship with intron. However, the relationship (if any) between SCUB and intron number as well as exon position is at present rather unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 27% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 18% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 73% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 14% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2013.
All research outputs
#18,332,122
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#8,152
of 10,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,977
of 282,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#275
of 362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.