↓ Skip to main content

Macular pigment in retinal health and disease

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Retina and Vitreous , August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 262)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Macular pigment in retinal health and disease
Published in
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous , August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40942-016-0044-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Verônica Castro Lima, Richard B. Rosen, Michel Farah

Abstract

Lutein and zeaxanthin, two carotenoid pigments of the xanthophyll subclass, are present in high concentrations in the retina, especially in the macula. They work as a filter protecting the macula from blue light and also as a resident antioxidant and free radical scavenger to reduce oxidative stress-induced damage. Many observational and interventional studies have suggested that lutein and zeaxanthin may reduce the risk of various eye diseases, especially late forms of AMD. In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that they could protect various ocular cells against oxidative damage. Recent research has shown that in addition to traditional mechanisms, lutein and zeaxanthin can influence the viability and function of cells through various signal pathways or transcription factors: for instance, they can affect immune responses and inflammation, and have anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor properties. This review covers the basic aspects and results of recent studies regarding the effects of lutein, zeaxanthin and other carotenoids, such as meso-zeaxanthin, on the eye in different clinical and experimental models and the management of various ocular diseases using these molecules.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 43 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 48 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#736,713
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
#4
of 262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,251
of 356,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 262 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them