↓ Skip to main content

Attitudes among healthcare professionals to the reporting of adverse drug reactions in Nepal

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attitudes among healthcare professionals to the reporting of adverse drug reactions in Nepal
Published in
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/2050-6511-14-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Santosh KC, Pramote Tragulpiankit, Sarun Gorsanan, I Ralph Edwards

Abstract

Healthcare professional's knowledge and attitudes to adverse drug reaction (ADR) and ADR reporting play vital role to report any cases of ADR. Positive attitudes may favour ADR reporting by healthcare professionals. This study was aimed to investigate the attitudes towards and ways to improve adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting among healthcare professionals working at four Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres (RPCs) of Nepal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 124 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Lecturer 7 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 44 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 31 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 48 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2013.
All research outputs
#18,332,122
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#310
of 438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,601
of 195,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.