↓ Skip to main content

Short term modulation of trunk neuromuscular responses following spinal manipulation: a control group study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Short term modulation of trunk neuromuscular responses following spinal manipulation: a control group study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-92
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie-Pierre Harvey, Martin Descarreaux

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most frequent musculoskeletal conditions in industrialized countries and its economic impact is important. Spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) is believed to be a valid approach in the treatment of both acute and chronic LBP. It has also been shown that SMT can modulate the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the paraspinal muscle. The purpose of this study was to investigate, in a group of patients with low back pain, the persistence of changes observed in trunk neuromuscular responses after a spinal manipulation (SMT).

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 176 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 22%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Researcher 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 49 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 20%
Sports and Recreations 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 62 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,617,914
of 23,868,111 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,514
of 4,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,677
of 198,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#32
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,868,111 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.