You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What supports physiotherapists’ use of research in clinical practice? A qualitative study in Sweden
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-31 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Petra Dannapfel, Anneli Peolsson, Per Nilsen |
| Abstract |
Evidence-based practice has increasingly been recognized as a priority by professional physiotherapy organizations and influential researchers and clinicians in the field. Numerous studies in the past decade have documented that physiotherapists hold generally favorable attitudes to evidence-based practice and recognize the importance of using research to guide their clinical practice. Research has predominantly investigated barriers to research use. Less is known about the circumstances that actually support use of research by physiotherapists. This study explores the conditions at different system levels that physiotherapists in Sweden perceive to be supportive of their use of research in clinical practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
| Chile | 3 | 13% |
| Canada | 3 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 227 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 20% |
| Unknown | 50 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 8% |
| Psychology | 13 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 61 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,085,904
of 24,532,617 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#429
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,658
of 200,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#9
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,532,617 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.