You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lung ultrasound response to awake prone positioning predicts the need for intubation in patients with COVID-19 induced acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: an observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-04064-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miguel Ibarra-Estrada, María J. Gamero-Rodríguez, Marina García-de-Acilu, Oriol Roca, Laura Sandoval-Plascencia, Guadalupe Aguirre-Avalos, Roxana García-Salcido, Sara A. Aguirre-Díaz, David L. Vines, Sara Mirza, Ramandeep Kaur, Tyler Weiss, Claude Guerin, Jie Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 21% |
| Mexico | 6 | 15% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Libya | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
| Scientists | 6 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,626,027
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,434
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,453
of 443,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#36
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.