You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Identification of a circulating microRNAs biomarker panel for non-invasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease: case–control study
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, June 2022
Hoda Y. Abdallah, Ranya Hassan, Ahmed Fareed, Mai Abdelgawad, Sally Abdallah Mostafa, Eman Abdel-Moemen Mohammed
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||5||38%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||15%|
|Student > Master||1||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||3||23%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||15%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||1||8%|
|Physics and Astronomy||1||8%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
of 1,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 443,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,723 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.