You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unified treatment algorithm for the management of crotaline snakebite in the United States: results of an evidence-informed consensus workshop
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Emergency Medicine, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-227x-11-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric J Lavonas, Anne-Michelle Ruha, William Banner, Vikhyat Bebarta, Jeffrey N Bernstein, Sean P Bush, William P Kerns, William H Richardson, Steven A Seifert, David A Tanen, Steve C Curry, Richard C Dart |
| Abstract |
Envenomation by crotaline snakes (rattlesnake, cottonmouth, copperhead) is a complex, potentially lethal condition affecting thousands of people in the United States each year. Treatment of crotaline envenomation is not standardized, and significant variation in practice exists. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 56% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Qatar | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 36% |
| Scientists | 5 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Professor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 27% |
| Unknown | 35 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 46 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,151,365
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#21
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,514
of 194,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.