↓ Skip to main content

Unified treatment algorithm for the management of crotaline snakebite in the United States: results of an evidence-informed consensus workshop

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Emergency Medicine, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 528)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unified treatment algorithm for the management of crotaline snakebite in the United States: results of an evidence-informed consensus workshop
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-227x-11-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric J Lavonas, Anne-Michelle Ruha, William Banner, Vikhyat Bebarta, Jeffrey N Bernstein, Sean P Bush, William P Kerns, William H Richardson, Steven A Seifert, David A Tanen, Steve C Curry, Richard C Dart

Abstract

Envenomation by crotaline snakes (rattlesnake, cottonmouth, copperhead) is a complex, potentially lethal condition affecting thousands of people in the United States each year. Treatment of crotaline envenomation is not standardized, and significant variation in practice exists.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
Netherlands 2 2%
Unknown 124 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 29 22%
Researcher 15 11%
Professor 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 37 28%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 28 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2021.
All research outputs
#686,590
of 17,638,294 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#12
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,851
of 192,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,638,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them