↓ Skip to main content

Community concepts of poverty: an application to premium exemptions in Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community concepts of poverty: an application to premium exemptions in Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme
Published in
Globalization and Health, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-9-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Genevieve C Aryeetey, Caroline Jehu-Appiah, Agnes M Kotoh, Ernst Spaan, Daniel K Arhinful, Rob Baltussen, Sjaak van der Geest, Irene A Agyepong

Abstract

Poverty is multi dimensional. Beyond the quantitative and tangible issues related to inadequate income it also has equally important social, more intangible and difficult if not impossible to quantify dimensions. In 2009, we explored these social and relativist dimension of poverty in five communities in the South of Ghana with differing socio economic characteristics to inform the development and implementation of policies and programs to identify and target the poor for premium exemptions under Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 2 1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 146 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 21%
Student > Master 28 18%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 39 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 6%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 31 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,205,295
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#846
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,755
of 209,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.