↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic regulation of epigenomic landscapes during hematopoiesis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic regulation of epigenomic landscapes during hematopoiesis
Published in
BMC Genomics, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian J Abraham, Kairong Cui, Qingsong Tang, Keji Zhao

Abstract

Human blood develops from self-renewing hematopoietic stem cells to terminal lineages and necessitates regulator and effector gene expression changes; each cell type specifically expresses a subset of genes to carry out a specific function. Gene expression changes coincide with histone modification, histone variant deposition, and recruitment of transcription-related enzymes to specific genetic loci. Transcriptional regulation has been mostly studied using in vitro systems while epigenetic changes occurring during in vivo development remain poorly understood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 92 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 30%
Researcher 25 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Master 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 12 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2013.
All research outputs
#6,782,242
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,966
of 10,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,270
of 199,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#36
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,793 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.