You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dynamic regulation of epigenomic landscapes during hematopoiesis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Genomics, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-193 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Brian J Abraham, Kairong Cui, Qingsong Tang, Keji Zhao |
Abstract |
Human blood develops from self-renewing hematopoietic stem cells to terminal lineages and necessitates regulator and effector gene expression changes; each cell type specifically expresses a subset of genes to carry out a specific function. Gene expression changes coincide with histone modification, histone variant deposition, and recruitment of transcription-related enzymes to specific genetic loci. Transcriptional regulation has been mostly studied using in vitro systems while epigenetic changes occurring during in vivo development remain poorly understood. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
France | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 92 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 30% |
Researcher | 25 | 26% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
Other | 15 | 15% |
Unknown | 9 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 54% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2013.
All research outputs
#6,782,242
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,966
of 10,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,270
of 199,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#36
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,793 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.