↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of Spanish adaptation of the European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementation of Spanish adaptation of the European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in primary care
Published in
BMC Primary Care, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-14-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Brotons, José Maria Lobos, Miguel Ángel Royo-Bordonada, Antonio Maiques, Ana de Santiago, Ángel Castellanos, Santiago Diaz, Juan Carlos Obaya, Juan Pedro-Botet, Irene Moral, Vicenta Lizarbe, Rosa Moreno, Antonio Pérez, Alberto Cordero, Francisco Fornés-Ubeda, Benilde Serrano-Saiz, Miguel Camafort-Babkowski, Roberto Elosua, Susana Sans, Carmen de Pablo, Antonio Gil-Nuñez, Fernando de Álvaro-Moreno, Pedro Armario, Olga Cortés Rico, Fernando Villar, Ángel Lizcano

Abstract

The successful implementation of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention guidelines relies heavily on primary care physicians (PCPs) providing risk factor evaluation, intervention and patient education. The aim of this study was to ascertain the degree of awareness and implementation of the Spanish adaptation of the European guidelines on CVD prevention in clinical practice (CEIPC guidelines) among PCPs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 19 26%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Psychology 5 7%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,914,476
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,330
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,032
of 222,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.