↓ Skip to main content

Modeling the indirect economic implications of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling the indirect economic implications of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-11-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy M Dall, Paul Gallo, Lane Koenig, Qian Gu, David Ruiz

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders impose a substantial economic burden on American society, but few studies have examined the economic benefits associated with treating such disorders. The purpose of this research is to estimate the indirect economic implications of activity limitations associated with musculoskeletal disorders and to quantifying the potential economic gains from elective surgery to treat arthritis of the knee and hip.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 96 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 14%
Researcher 13 13%
Other 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,237,961
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#201
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,424
of 209,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.