You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic depression screening in high-risk patients attending primary care: a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-13-83 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irene Romera, Ángel L Montejo, Enric Aragonés, José Ángel Arbesú, Celso Iglesias-García, Silvia López, José Antonio Lozano, Sireesha Pamulapati, Belen Yruretagoyena, Inmaculada Gilaberte |
| Abstract |
Systematic screening for depression in high-risk patients is recommended but remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of such screening in everyday clinical practice on depression recognition. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 21% |
| Unknown | 21 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 38% |
| Psychology | 15 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2013.
All research outputs
#13,148,117
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,705
of 4,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,154
of 195,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#52
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.