↓ Skip to main content

Intestinal microbiota, probiotics and mental health: from Metchnikoff to modern advances: part III – convergence toward clinical trials

Overview of attention for article published in Gut Pathogens, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 615)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
16 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
345 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intestinal microbiota, probiotics and mental health: from Metchnikoff to modern advances: part III – convergence toward clinical trials
Published in
Gut Pathogens, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1757-4749-5-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison C Bested, Alan C Logan, Eva M Selhub

Abstract

Rapid scientific and technological advances have allowed for a more detailed understanding of the relevance of intestinal microbiota, and the entire body-wide microbiome, to human health and well-being. Rodent studies have provided suggestive evidence that probiotics (e.g. lactobacillus and bifidobacteria) can influence behavior. More importantly, emerging clinical studies indicate that the administration of beneficial microbes, via supplementation and/or fecal microbial transplant (FMT), can influence end-points related to mood state (glycemic control, oxidative status, uremic toxins), brain function (functional magnetic resonance imaging fMRI), and mental outlook (depression, anxiety). However, despite the advances in the area of gastro-biological psychiatry, it becomes clear that there remains an urgent need to explore the value of beneficial microbes in controlled clinical investigations. With the history explored in this series, it is fair to ask if we are now on the cusp of major clinical breakthroughs, or are we merely in the quicksand of Autointoxication II?

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 333 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 19%
Student > Bachelor 55 16%
Researcher 39 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Other 25 7%
Other 58 17%
Unknown 66 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 19%
Psychology 28 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 8%
Neuroscience 16 5%
Other 45 13%
Unknown 81 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#907,416
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Gut Pathogens
#13
of 615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,305
of 214,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut Pathogens
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.