You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Engaging primary care practitioners in quality improvement: making explicit the program theory of an interprofessional education intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-106 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brigitte Vachon, Bruno Désorcy, Michel Camirand, Jean Rodrigue, Louise Quesnel, Claude Guimond, Martin Labelle, Johanne Fournier, Jeremy Grimshaw |
| Abstract |
The scientific literature continues to advocate interprofessional collaboration (IPC) as a key component of primary care. It is recommended that primary care groups be created and configured to meet the healthcare needs of the patient population, as defined by patient demographics and other data analyses related to the health of the population being served. It is further recommended that the improvement of primary care services be supported by the delivery of feedback and performance measurements. This paper describes the theory underlying an interprofessional educational intervention developed in Quebec's Montérégie region (Canada) for the purpose of improving chronic disease management in primary care. The objectives of this study were to explain explicitly the theory underlying this intervention, to describe its components in detail and to assess the intervention's feasibility and acceptability. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 20% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Chile | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 167 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 17% |
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 25% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2017.
All research outputs
#5,392,510
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,299
of 7,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,521
of 197,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#34
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.