You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
‘Trying to pin down jelly’ - exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-13-46 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francine Toye, Kate Seers, Nick Allcock, Michelle Briggs, Eloise Carr, JoyAnn Andrews, Karen Barker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 56% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 15% |
| Psychology | 17 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,350,993
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#331
of 2,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,881
of 211,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.