You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Network analysis of team communication in a busy emergency department
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-109 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
P Daniel Patterson, Anthony J Pfeiffer, Matthew D Weaver, David Krackhardt, Robert M Arnold, Donald M Yealy, Judith R Lave |
Abstract |
The Emergency Department (ED) is consistently described as a high-risk environment for patients and clinicians that demands colleagues quickly work together as a cohesive group. Communication between nurses, physicians, and other ED clinicians is complex and difficult to track. A clear understanding of communications in the ED is lacking, which has a potentially negative impact on the design and effectiveness of interventions to improve communications. We sought to use Social Network Analysis (SNA) to characterize communication between clinicians in the ED. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 40% |
Canada | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 116 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
Other | 22 | 19% |
Unknown | 19 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 14% |
Psychology | 11 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 5% |
Other | 22 | 19% |
Unknown | 25 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2017.
All research outputs
#13,239,290
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,291
of 7,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,723
of 199,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#63
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.