↓ Skip to main content

Autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease: a review and proposal for the prevention of Alzheimer's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
418 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
635 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease: a review and proposal for the prevention of Alzheimer's disease
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/alzrt59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Randall J Bateman, Paul S Aisen, Bart De Strooper, Nick C Fox, Cynthia A Lemere, John M Ringman, Stephen Salloway, Reisa A Sperling, Manfred Windisch, Chengjie Xiong

Abstract

Autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease has provided significant understanding of the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease. The present review summarizes clinical, pathological, imaging, biochemical, and molecular studies of autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease, highlighting the similarities and differences between the dominantly inherited form of Alzheimer's disease and the more common sporadic form of Alzheimer's disease. Current developments in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease are presented, including the international Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network and this network's initiative for clinical trials. Clinical trials in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease may test the amyloid hypothesis, determine the timing of treatment, and lead the way to Alzheimer's disease prevention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 635 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 619 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 121 19%
Student > Bachelor 84 13%
Researcher 77 12%
Student > Master 75 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 5%
Other 82 13%
Unknown 164 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 14%
Neuroscience 86 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 83 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 81 13%
Psychology 28 4%
Other 76 12%
Unknown 194 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#346,685
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#52
of 1,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,403
of 190,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them