You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Derivation and validation of a simple clinical bedside score (ATLAS) for Clostridium difficile infection which predicts response to therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-13-148 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mark A Miller, Thomas Louie, Kathleen Mullane, Karl Weiss, Arnold Lentnek, Yoav Golan, Yin Kean, Pam Sears |
Abstract |
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) continues to be a frequent and potentially severe infection. There is currently no validated clinical tool for use at the time of CDI diagnosis to categorize patients in order to predict response to therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ecuador | 1 | 20% |
Spain | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 86 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 15 | 17% |
Researcher | 13 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Other | 23 | 26% |
Unknown | 12 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 48% |
Unspecified | 6 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 21 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,102,908
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,487
of 7,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,673
of 199,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#53
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.