Title |
The most effective strategy for recruiting a pregnancy cohort: a tale of two cities
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-13-75 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Donna P Manca, Maeve O’Beirne, Teresa Lightbody, David W Johnston, Dayna-Lynn Dymianiw, Katarzyna Nastalska, Lubna Anis, Sarah Loehr, Anne Gilbert, Bonnie J Kaplan, the APrON study team |
Abstract |
Pregnant women were recruited into the Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition (APrON) study in two cities in Alberta, Calgary and Edmonton. In Calgary, a larger proportion of women obtain obstetrical care from family physicians than from obstetricians; otherwise the cities have similar characteristics. Despite similarities of the cities, the recruitment success was very different. The purpose of this paper is to describe recruitment strategies, determine which were most successful and discuss reasons for the different success rates between the two cities. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ethiopia | 1 | 1% |
Malawi | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
Researcher | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
Psychology | 8 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 23 | 29% |