↓ Skip to main content

The most effective strategy for recruiting a pregnancy cohort: a tale of two cities

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The most effective strategy for recruiting a pregnancy cohort: a tale of two cities
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-13-75
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donna P Manca, Maeve O’Beirne, Teresa Lightbody, David W Johnston, Dayna-Lynn Dymianiw, Katarzyna Nastalska, Lubna Anis, Sarah Loehr, Anne Gilbert, Bonnie J Kaplan, the APrON study team

Abstract

Pregnant women were recruited into the Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition (APrON) study in two cities in Alberta, Calgary and Edmonton. In Calgary, a larger proportion of women obtain obstetrical care from family physicians than from obstetricians; otherwise the cities have similar characteristics. Despite similarities of the cities, the recruitment success was very different. The purpose of this paper is to describe recruitment strategies, determine which were most successful and discuss reasons for the different success rates between the two cities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 1%
Malawi 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 19 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 20%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Psychology 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 23 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2013.
All research outputs
#13,859,387
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,536
of 4,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,626
of 199,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#46
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.