↓ Skip to main content

Treatment outcome of chronic low back pain and radiographic lumbar disc degeneration are associated with inflammatory and matrix degrading gene variants: a prospective genetic association study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment outcome of chronic low back pain and radiographic lumbar disc degeneration are associated with inflammatory and matrix degrading gene variants: a prospective genetic association study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmad Omair, Marit Holden, Benedicte Alexandra Lie, Olav Reikeras, Jens Ivar Brox

Abstract

Inflammatory and matrix degrading gene variants have been reported to be associated with disc degeneration. Some of these variants also modulate peripheral pain. This study examines the association of these genetic variants with radiographic lumbar disc degeneration and changes in pain and disability at long-term after surgical and cognitive behavioural management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Other 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 46 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Sports and Recreations 7 5%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 50 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,745,139
of 23,332,901 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#729
of 4,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,385
of 198,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#14
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,332,901 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.