↓ Skip to main content

The reliability and validity of the Questionnaire - Children with Difficulties (QCD)

Overview of attention for article published in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The reliability and validity of the Questionnaire - Children with Difficulties (QCD)
Published in
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1753-2000-7-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masahide Usami, Daimei Sasayama, Nobuhiro Sugiyama, Nana Hosogane, Soo-Yung Kim, Yushiro Yamashita, Masaki Kodaira, Kyota Watanabe, Yoshitaka Iwadare, Tetsuji Sawa, Kazuhiko Saito

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Questionnaire-Children with Difficulties (QCD), which was developed for the evaluation of children's daily life behaviors during specified periods of the day.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 3 8%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Other 6 16%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Psychology 7 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#572
of 782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,264
of 210,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.