You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Low concordance of multiple variant-calling pipelines: practical implications for exome and genome sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gm432 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason O'Rawe, Tao Jiang, Guangqing Sun, Yiyang Wu, Wei Wang, Jingchu Hu, Paul Bodily, Lifeng Tian, Hakon Hakonarson, W Evan Johnson, Zhi Wei, Kai Wang, Gholson J Lyon |
| Abstract |
To facilitate the clinical implementation of genomic medicine by next-generation sequencing, it will be critically important to obtain accurate and consistent variant calls on personal genomes. Multiple software tools for variant calling are available, but it is unclear how comparable these tools are or what their relative merits in real-world scenarios might be. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 14% |
| France | 6 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| China | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 62 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 47 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 782 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 34 | 4% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Italy | 5 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 25 | 3% |
| Unknown | 687 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 251 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 186 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 80 | 10% |
| Other | 48 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 41 | 5% |
| Other | 107 | 14% |
| Unknown | 69 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 361 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 153 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 72 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 7% |
| Engineering | 10 | 1% |
| Other | 42 | 5% |
| Unknown | 87 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#383,746
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#62
of 1,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,510
of 212,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.