You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of telemonitoring home care patients with heart failure or chronic lung disease from primary care on healthcare resource use (the TELBIL study randomised controlled trial)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-118 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Iñaki Martín-Lesende, Estibalitz Orruño, Amaia Bilbao, Itziar Vergara, Mª Carmen Cairo, Juan Carlos Bayón, Eva Reviriego, María Isabel Romo, Jesús Larrañaga, José Asua, Roberto Abad, Elizabete Recalde |
Abstract |
There is growing evidence that home telemonitoring can be advantageous in societies with increasing prevalence of chronic diseases.The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of a primary care-based telemonitoring intervention on the number and length of hospital admissions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 39% |
Spain | 5 | 28% |
Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 246 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 52 | 20% |
Researcher | 28 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
Other | 53 | 21% |
Unknown | 63 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 15 | 6% |
Psychology | 7 | 3% |
Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
Other | 35 | 14% |
Unknown | 71 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,638,428
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#540
of 8,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,678
of 214,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#10
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.