↓ Skip to main content

Impact of telemonitoring home care patients with heart failure or chronic lung disease from primary care on healthcare resource use (the TELBIL study randomised controlled trial)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of telemonitoring home care patients with heart failure or chronic lung disease from primary care on healthcare resource use (the TELBIL study randomised controlled trial)
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iñaki Martín-Lesende, Estibalitz Orruño, Amaia Bilbao, Itziar Vergara, Mª Carmen Cairo, Juan Carlos Bayón, Eva Reviriego, María Isabel Romo, Jesús Larrañaga, José Asua, Roberto Abad, Elizabete Recalde

Abstract

There is growing evidence that home telemonitoring can be advantageous in societies with increasing prevalence of chronic diseases.The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of a primary care-based telemonitoring intervention on the number and length of hospital admissions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 246 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 20%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 53 21%
Unknown 63 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 14%
Social Sciences 15 6%
Psychology 7 3%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 71 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,638,428
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#540
of 8,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,678
of 214,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#10
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.