↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment among socioeconomically disadvantaged patients: study protocol for a knowledge exchange intervention involving patients and…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancing screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment among socioeconomically disadvantaged patients: study protocol for a knowledge exchange intervention involving patients and physicians
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ginetta Salvalaggio, Kathryn Dong, Christine Vandenberghe, Scott Kirkland, Kelsey Mramor, Taryn Brown, Marliss Taylor, Robert McKim, Greta G Cummings, T Cameron Wild

Abstract

Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral for Treatment (SBIRT) is an effective approach for managing alcohol and other drug misuse in primary care; however, uptake into routine care has been limited. Uptake of SBIRT by healthcare providers may be particularly problematic for disadvantaged populations exhibiting alcohol and other drug problems, and requires creative approaches to enhance patient engagement. This knowledge translation project developed and evaluated a group of patient and health care provider resources designed to enhance the capacity of health care providers to use SBIRT and improve patient engagement with health care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 19%
Student > Master 29 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 38 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Psychology 18 12%
Social Sciences 16 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 45 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,185,031
of 23,504,998 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,934
of 7,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,462
of 199,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#70
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.