↓ Skip to main content

Relationships amongst osteoarthritis biomarkers, dynamic knee joint load, and exercise: results from a randomized controlled pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationships amongst osteoarthritis biomarkers, dynamic knee joint load, and exercise: results from a randomized controlled pilot study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael A Hunt, Courtney L Pollock, Virginia Byers Kraus, Tore Saxne, Sue Peters, Janet L Huebner, Eric C Sayre, Jolanda Cibere

Abstract

Little is known about the relationships of circulating levels of biomarkers of cartilage degradation with biomechanical outcomes relevant to knee osteoarthritis (OA) or biomarker changes following non-pharmacological interventions. The objectives of this exploratory, pilot study were to: 1) examine relationships between biomarkers of articular cartilage degradation and synthesis with measures of knee joint load during walking, and 2) examine changes in these biomarkers following 10 weeks of strengthening exercises.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 213 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Student > Master 23 11%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 71 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Sports and Recreations 11 5%
Engineering 10 5%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 86 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,165,787
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,110
of 4,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,886
of 197,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#58
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.