You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Variability and homogeneity of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial T2-mapping in volunteers compared to patients with edema
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-15-27 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ralf Wassmuth, Marcel Prothmann, Wolfgang Utz, Matthias Dieringer, Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Andreas Greiser, Jeanette Schulz-Menger |
Abstract |
The aim of the study was to test the reproducibility and variability of myocardial T2 mapping in relation to sequence type and spatial orientation in a large group of healthy volunteers. For control T2 mapping was also applied in patients with true edema. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) T2-mapping has potential for the detection and quantification of myocardial edema. Clinical experience is limited so far. The variability and potential pitfalls in broad application are unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Poland | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 13% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 10 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 53% |
Engineering | 11 | 13% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,219,839
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,165
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,140
of 211,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.