↓ Skip to main content

Development of a patient-centred care pathway across healthcare providers: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a patient-centred care pathway across healthcare providers: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tove Røsstad, Helge Garåsen, Aslak Steinsbekk, Olav Sletvold, Anders Grimsmo

Abstract

Different models for care pathways involving both specialist and primary care have been developed to ensure adequate follow-up after discharge. These care pathways have mainly been developed and run by specialist care and have been disease-based. In this study, primary care providers took the initiative to develop a model for integrated care pathways across care levels for older patients in need of home care services after discharge. Initially, the objective was to develop pathways for patients diagnosed with heart failure, COPD and stroke. The aim of this paper is to investigate the process and the experiences of the participants in this developmental work. The participants were drawn from three hospitals, six municipalities and patient organizations in Central Norway.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 198 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 18%
Student > Master 36 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 13 6%
Other 51 24%
Unknown 22 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 15%
Social Sciences 26 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 6%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 29 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2019.
All research outputs
#984,241
of 16,663,134 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#335
of 5,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,547
of 158,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,663,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them