↓ Skip to main content

Protocol for a phase 1 homeopathic drug proving trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protocol for a phase 1 homeopathic drug proving trial
Published in
Trials, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-11-80
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Teut, Ute Hirschberg, Rainer Luedtke, Cristoph Schnegg, Joern Dahler, Henning Albrecht, Claudia M Witt

Abstract

This study protocol adapts the traditional homeopathic drug proving methodology to a modern clinical trial design.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 23%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 56%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Psychology 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 7 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2015.
All research outputs
#13,312,765
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#3,202
of 5,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,039
of 94,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.