↓ Skip to main content

Graph ranking for exploratory gene data analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Graph ranking for exploratory gene data analysis
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-10-s11-s19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cuilan Gao, Xin Dang, Yixin Chen, Dawn Wilkins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Colombia 1 4%
Denmark 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 22 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 31%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Master 1 4%
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 9 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 23%
Mathematics 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,657,585
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,075
of 7,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,871
of 94,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#28
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.