You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of a simulation technical competence curriculum for medical simulation fellows
|
---|---|
Published in |
Advances in Simulation, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41077-022-00221-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rami A. Ahmed, Dylan Cooper, Chassity L. Mays, Chris M. Weidman, Julie A. Poore, Anna M. Bona, Lauren E. Falvo, Malia J. Moore, Sally A. Mitchell, Tanna J. Boyer, S. Scott Atkinson, Johnny F. Cartwright |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 11% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Spain | 1 | 11% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 19% |
Unspecified | 3 | 14% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,606,082
of 24,796,076 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#120
of 259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,745
of 423,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,796,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.