You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The impact of diurnal variation on induced sputum cell counts in healthy adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/2045-7022-3-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Warren J Davidson, Lisa E Wong, Stephanie The, Richard Leigh |
Abstract |
Induced sputum cell counts are a non-invasive, reliable method for evaluating the presence, type, and degree of inflammation in the airways of the lungs. Current reference values for induced sputum cell counts in healthy adults do not account for the effects of circadian rhythm, including diurnal variation. The objective of this study was to describe the diurnal variation in induced sputum cell counts, compared between early morning and late afternoon, in healthy adult individuals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 27% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 18% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2013.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#577
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,222
of 210,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.