↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Enteral vs. intravenous ICU sedation management: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Blogs Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enteral vs. intravenous ICU sedation management: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-92
Pubmed ID
23551983
Authors

Giovanni Mistraletti, Elena S Mantovani, Paolo Cadringher, Barbara Cerri, Davide Corbella, Michele Umbrello, Stefania Anania, Elisa Andrighi, Serena Barello, Alessandra Carlo, Federica Martinetti, Paolo Formenti, Paolo Spanu, Gaetano Iapichino

Abstract

A relevant innovation about sedation of long-term Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients is the 'conscious target': patients should be awake even during the critical phases of illness. Enteral sedative administration is nowadays unusual, even though the gastrointestinal tract works soon after ICU admission. The enteral approach cannot produce deep sedation; however, it is as adequate as the intravenous one, if the target is to keep patients awake and adapted to the environment, and has fewer side effects and lower costs.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Italy 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 180 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 17%
Researcher 30 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Other 11 6%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 42 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Psychology 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 54 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2013.
All research outputs
#1,821,099
of 16,657,433 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#684
of 4,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,795
of 157,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,657,433 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.

This page is provided by Altmetric.