↓ Skip to main content

Promises and pitfalls in implementation science from the perspective of US-based researchers: learning from a pre-mortem

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
73 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Promises and pitfalls in implementation science from the perspective of US-based researchers: learning from a pre-mortem
Published in
Implementation Science, August 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13012-022-01226-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rinad S. Beidas, Shannon Dorsey, Cara C. Lewis, Aaron R. Lyon, Byron J. Powell, Jonathan Purtle, Lisa Saldana, Rachel C. Shelton, Shannon Wiltsey Stirman, Meghan B. Lane-Fall

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 26 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 13%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 29 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#922,053
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#113
of 1,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,173
of 431,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.