↓ Skip to main content

Promises and pitfalls in implementation science from the perspective of US-based researchers: learning from a pre-mortem

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
68 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Promises and pitfalls in implementation science from the perspective of US-based researchers: learning from a pre-mortem
Published in
Implementation Science, August 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13012-022-01226-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rinad S. Beidas, Shannon Dorsey, Cara C. Lewis, Aaron R. Lyon, Byron J. Powell, Jonathan Purtle, Lisa Saldana, Rachel C. Shelton, Shannon Wiltsey Stirman, Meghan B. Lane-Fall

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 18%
Unspecified 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 14 31%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 20%
Social Sciences 8 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Unspecified 5 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#839,363
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#129
of 1,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,616
of 431,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.