↓ Skip to main content

Defining and improving quality management in Dutch diabetes care groups and outpatient clinics: design of the study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Defining and improving quality management in Dutch diabetes care groups and outpatient clinics: design of the study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marjo JE Campmans-Kuijpers, Lidwien C Lemmens, Caroline A Baan, Kees J Gorter, Jolanda Groothuis, Klementine H van Vuure, Guy EHM Rutten

Abstract

Worldwide, the organisation of diabetes care is changing. As a result general practices and diabetes teams in hospitals are becoming part of new organisations in which multidisciplinary care programs are implemented. In the Netherlands, 97 diabetes care groups and 104 outpatient clinics are working with a diabetes care program. Both types of organisations aim to improve the quality of diabetes care. Therefore, it is essential to understand the comprehensive elements needed for optimal quality management at organisational level. This study aims to assess the current level of diabetes quality management in both care groups and outpatient clinics and its improvement after providing feedback on their quality management system and tailored support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 24%
Social Sciences 6 12%
Psychology 5 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,426,232
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,682
of 7,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,134
of 199,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#51
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.